Reflections and New Directions
The next challenge Mary and I face is to prepare an abstract/presentation for the 2nd Workshop on Distributed Communities of Practice (DCoP), which will be hosted by the International Centre for Governance and Development at the University of Saskatchewan in September. We have been asked to focus on the cultural aspects of the relationship between the traditional academy (TA) and the knowledge economy (KE).
To date, we have identified mutual dependencies (Slide 3) as being the shared needs of the TA and KE for: a productive economy & thriving societal culture, continuing the quest for knowledge & innovation, highly educated members, and the continuous addition of new members, as well as an acknowledgement of learning as “the principal kind of production and consumption.”
In addition, we have identified cultural tensions betweem the TA and KE as including the Knowledge Economy's valuing of learning opportunities for non-traditional learners engaged in continuous and collaborative learning. We have attested that the goals of the knowledge economy for knowledge workers (slide 4) include skill acquisition and problem-solving abilities in order to increase productivity through innovation and the creation of new commodities.
In contrast, we argue that the Academy more highly values traditional (full-time, residential)learners (slide 4) who engage in periodic (program-based)learning and who strive for individual achievement via knowledge transmission from the professoriate and open discourse wihin the academy. We identify the goals of the academy as including the preparation of educated thinkers, who in turn, become well informed and reflective citizens.
Do you think the identified tensions are accurate? Inevitable? Is there an ethical, comfortable balance of pragmatic and philosophic interests that could be reached? Are we really looking at a contrast between agency and scholarship as the proverbial double-sided coin?
Gale
